spéciale (délits de violence contre la femme), auto de 18/12/ (/09) .. 18 In accordance with Article (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ley de. dicha competencia de conformidad con su propia ley procesal y teniendo en cuenta los 10 Decision of the Colombian Constitutional Court, C – / Ley, 7, ; (3″) Ley and Engelhardt, 26, ; (“») Leyko and Marohlewski, , ; (3»») Malareki and Marchlewski, , ;

Author: Zulkisar Bara
Country: Cameroon
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 20 June 2005
Pages: 478
PDF File Size: 4.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.43 Mb
ISBN: 990-5-75232-884-8
Downloads: 57760
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kezuru

Use the Advanced search. Common Market Law Review p. Bay Larsen RapporteurA. Need more search options? East-West collaboration in the mapping of Qing China c.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

N 1 71 FA The main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling. N 10 72 – 74 76 FC3: Home Groups Talk Zeitgeist.

Each Member State shall ensure that, where there is a need to protect victims — particularly those most vulnerable — from the effects of giving evidence in open court, victims may, by decision taken by the court, be entitled to testify in a manner which will enable this objective to be achieved, by any appropriate means compatible with its basic legal principles. In respect of the crimes of homicide, abortion, assault causing injury, deprivation of liberty and torture, and leu infringing moral integrity, sexual liberty, privacy, the 52-09 to protection of personal image and the inviolability of the home …, the courts or tribunals may, having regard to the gravity of the offences or the danger which the offender represents, impose when sentencing one or more of the injunctions referred to in Article 48 … … 2.

Costs leey in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable.

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. Frontiers of Astrophysics by Eugene H. MDS “scheduldes” the words that describe the numbers are user-added, and based on public domain editions of the system. Wordings, which are entered by members, can only come from public domain sources. MDS “scheduldes” the words that describe the numbers ldy user-added, and based on public domain editions of the system.

  ASTM E317-11 PDF

MDS: | LibraryThing

N 1 47 – 49 54 70 FA LibraryThing’s MDS system is based on the classification work of libraries around the ely, whose assignments are not copyrightable. Second, the procedural right to be heard under the first le of Article 3 of the Framework Decision does not confer on victims any rights in respect of the choice of form of penalties nor in respect of the level of those penalties.

I Agree This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and if not signed in for advertising. The latter provision specifies, inter alia, a spouse or an individual related by comparable emotional bonds, even when there is no cohabitation.

Notes relating to the decision: LibraryThing’s MDS system is based on the classification work of libraries around the world, whose assignments are not copyrightable. Shu Radio Astronomy by F. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Melvil Decimal System: 523.0

Where useful or necessary, wording comes from the edition of the Dewey Decimal System. Language and concepts may be changed to fit modern tastes, or to better describe books cataloged. Court of Justice Country or organisation from which the decision originates: In that regard, in addition to the fact that Article 34 2 EU leaves to national authorities the choice of form and methods necessary to achieve the desired result of framework decisions, Article 10 1 of the Framework Decision does no more than require Member States to seek to promote mediation in criminal cases for offences which they consider appropriate, and consequently the choice of the offences for which mediation is to be available is for the Member States to determine.

N 7 58 FA03L1: Unzeitig, acting as Agents. Works under MDS Languages and formats available. Help Print this page.

Where appropriate for that purpose, each Member State shall progressively provide that court premises have special waiting areas for victims. Judgment of the Court Fourth Chamber of 15 September N 72 74 5523-09 I Agree This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and if not signed in for advertising.

  CSTCE20M0V53 R0 PDF

EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law. To that end, and without prejudice to paragraph 4, each Member State shall guarantee that it is possible to adopt, if necessary, as part of the court proceedings, appropriate measures to protect the privacy and photographic image of victims and their families or persons in a similar position.

Where the criminal law offers protection against acts of domestic violence, the objective is not only to protect the interests of the victim but also other more general interests of society. Gas Dynamics by Frank H. N 30 38 MP1: A Biography of S.

Wordings may not come from in-copyright sources. First, the obligations laid down in Article 2 1 of the Framework Decision are intended to ensure that a victim can effectively and adequately take part in the criminal proceedings, which does not imply that a mandatory injunction to stay away cannot be imposed contrary to the wishes of the victim.

Graham Smith The Cosmic Century: Johannesson, acting as Agents. Where useful or necessary, wording comes from the edition of the Dewey Decimal System. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 3 Marchafter considering the observations submitted on behalf of: Each Member State shall further ensure that contact between victims and offenders within court premises may be avoided, unless criminal proceedings require such contact.

MDS classes with significant recommendations overlap, excluding ones under the same top-level class. Each Member State shall ensure a suitable level of protection for victims and, where appropriate, their families …, particularly as regards their safety and protection of their privacy, where the competent authorities consider that there is a serious risk of reprisals or firm evidence of serious intent to intrude upon their privacy.

References for a preliminary ruling: